The Noble Peace Prize winner of 2009, the incumbent America President Obama, was challenged internationally by the core objection of "lack of concrete fruition in dealing with world peace". I am a layman in the field of America's political movement and her latest policy changes. However, two aspects should be considered before judging Obama deserved or not.
1. Any influence from the policy changes of America should not be compared and even offset by other nations. The influential synergy, thus far, as one of the most leading superpowers, is totally out of several globally top leader's advocacy. The contradiction of America against the countries of Middle East, Latin America and North Korea, which is rooted long from America's arrogance and unfriendly attitude towards the range of American value and preference, engenders the disadvantages and revenge of another side being playing down, which is always the cause of nuclear weapon and violence other than political and economic tactics a country not prevailed.
2. Since Bush after Clinton, America had her unilateral policy for eight years at least. Through these years deepened along the value and operation widespread, to reform the preference of American's logic and savour is not an easy task. It needs brave and dauntless resolution of a new leader ruling the party, the government, the nationals, and the countries that counteracted against America. The reform to change, which is as pronounced as Obama in President election, will adjust enormously and substantially the administrative machine of a country. This is the point that should be aware while criticising, in particular a political assessment, if you do not have the sense of politics.
From the words above, you will guess out what my attitude towards Noble Peace Prize winner of 2009. The President of America, Obama, go ahead!! Please lead the world by America's existing advantages and drive vigilance into friendship.
1. Any influence from the policy changes of America should not be compared and even offset by other nations. The influential synergy, thus far, as one of the most leading superpowers, is totally out of several globally top leader's advocacy. The contradiction of America against the countries of Middle East, Latin America and North Korea, which is rooted long from America's arrogance and unfriendly attitude towards the range of American value and preference, engenders the disadvantages and revenge of another side being playing down, which is always the cause of nuclear weapon and violence other than political and economic tactics a country not prevailed.
2. Since Bush after Clinton, America had her unilateral policy for eight years at least. Through these years deepened along the value and operation widespread, to reform the preference of American's logic and savour is not an easy task. It needs brave and dauntless resolution of a new leader ruling the party, the government, the nationals, and the countries that counteracted against America. The reform to change, which is as pronounced as Obama in President election, will adjust enormously and substantially the administrative machine of a country. This is the point that should be aware while criticising, in particular a political assessment, if you do not have the sense of politics.
From the words above, you will guess out what my attitude towards Noble Peace Prize winner of 2009. The President of America, Obama, go ahead!! Please lead the world by America's existing advantages and drive vigilance into friendship.
沒有留言:
發佈留言