University ranking is not only the selecting mechanic, but also, rather, the product of psycho-social behaviour in society with vaingloarious identity as a speeding prove of personal success. In other words, It functions as the kind of self-fulfillment rather than for selection purpose.
Does ranking really select accurately in the field of university education? It needs more researches for evidence before judging. However, one thing is prior to any evidence. That is student is "human being" who is a "changing subject". He is growing up along his life. Full of variables and possibilities existed possibly among the university environment in contrast to an example of oranges sold in the market by different quality ranking to determine the quality of oranges in qualitative sequence, which only are a ranking matter of "object", or "unchanged fate".
(The response to the topic "大學排名影響青年初次就業" discussed in an interent forum on 30 August 2009.)
Does ranking really select accurately in the field of university education? It needs more researches for evidence before judging. However, one thing is prior to any evidence. That is student is "human being" who is a "changing subject". He is growing up along his life. Full of variables and possibilities existed possibly among the university environment in contrast to an example of oranges sold in the market by different quality ranking to determine the quality of oranges in qualitative sequence, which only are a ranking matter of "object", or "unchanged fate".
(The response to the topic "大學排名影響青年初次就業" discussed in an interent forum on 30 August 2009.)
沒有留言:
發佈留言