Social Order is Superior to the Freedom of Speech in Weighing with Radio Chaos

It is not understandable about the provisional judging suspense of the request of the illicit broadcast banning injunction prolonged. The suspense reason is mainly of the illicit occupied channel with "no impinging over normal emergency use and public safety" said by Justice Hartmann of the High Court.

Again, I agree with the government's contradiction of the concern of the "simulating behaviour" if civil broadcast is acknowledged as a matter of unconditional act. The said case is not sufficient to compare with the outcome of actual effect. It can be calamitous of no further ban over the equipments for civil broadcast if the functioning is stronger than the said case. Any legal permission will impose its burden over future functioning of radio. The determination generates a very possible conclusion of radio malfunctioning.

Our worry is very simple: we take moderate balance while weighing the proportion between the freedom of speech and social disorder. And we are more concerned the latter one for the radio chaos in real sense. A more significant viewpoint is that the ban over the civil broadcast does not necessarily contradict the freedom of speech.